Tag Archive: attorney

1. Moving On…

   February 19, 2013 2:57 pm Leave a Comment

   

   By Marie Nickle

   We have to accept, as Collaborative Professionals, that the Collaborative process is not a panacea.  There are many individuals who simply just want to remain in conflict and all the helping to communicate and constructive problem solving we, as conflict resolution experts, can muster will not work.  There is one simple condition needed to assess whether the Collaborative Process is fitting for the case and that is whether the parties are ready to move on from the conflict.  Simple, in that this is the one condition needed, yet not so simple to ascertain.  Of course, most will say they are ready to move on, but behaviour will dictate otherwise.  Absent influence, intimidation, and so on, a party’s readiness to be objectively reasonable is the indicator as to whether that party is ready to move on from the conflict. As lawyers advising our clients, it is as equally important to direct our clients correctly on process, as on the substantive legal issues. If the Collaborative process is the right process, then the client needs to know.  However, the client also needs to know if it is not.  Regardless, due to the last twenty years of sweeping ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution) trends, lawyers need to be apprised of what is out there so they are in a position to properly advise and be responsive to their clients’ needs.  This has resulted with more up-front work needed by the lawyer with the client.  This simply forms part of the new way to practice law, and in particular, Family Law.  If done well, the lawyer will understand whether the client is truly ready to move on…or not.

   Marie Nickle is a lawyer and mediator.  She also trains lawyers and other professionals in the Collaborative Process of Dispute Resolution.

   Marie B. NickleThe Galleria 204-1715 Lakeshore Rd. West Mississauga, Ontario L5J 1J6

   Profession: Family Law Lawyer, Mediator, Collaborative Trainer Tel: 905-823-1232 Fax: 905-823-7104 mariebnickle@bellnet.ca www.mbnlegalresolutions.com

2. Client Satisfaction and the Collaborative Law Experience

   June 25, 2012 3:12 pm Leave a Comment

   

   Jessie Lamont & Fareen Jamal

   By Fareen L. Jamal and Jessie Lamont

   Lawyers report the practise of family law litigation to be particularly toxic. The Collaborative Family Law Process creates a more desirable working environment for those lawyers inclined toward problem solving, as opposed to vitriolic litigation. But do clients have the same level of satisfaction with the collaborative process as experienced by collaborative lawyers?

   The International Academy of Collaborative Professionals (“IACP”) recently published their findings following extensive research [Linda Wray, “IACP Research Regarding Collaborative Practice (Basic Findings”), The Collaborative Review 12 (2012): 8]. Statistics reflect that the collaborative process is primarily employed by middle to upper middle class, educated divorcing spouses with children, most of whom use some form of the interdisciplinary approach (that is using financial, family or other professionals) in their seperation. Although the vast majority (86%) of these cases settle within approximately eight months through the collaborative process, there is a small percentage of cases that do not settle or are unsatisfied with the process.

   In terms of actual client satisfaction, approximately three-quarters of all collaborative clients polled in the IACP Professional Practice Survey reported being extremely or somewhat satisfied. Even more notably, the satisfaction clients felt for the process slightly outweighed their satisfaction with outcome.

   Clients indicated that they were satisfied with the manner in which their personal respect and respect for their viewpoint was maintained, the manner in which matters were clearly explained, their concerns and confusion addressed, the effectiveness with which their lawyers communicated, and the assistance they received with the development of their parenting plans and options for various issues.

   Collaborative Family Law creates and nurtures a “safe space” for clients who are frequently, at their most vulnerable, addressing a drastic change in their lifestyle, and experiencing intense emotions.

   Separation and divorce present a number of challenges and the success and satisfaction rates of any legal processes are important to consider.

   Seek out personal experiences of collaborative clients and lawyers before selecting the approach you wish to take. Self-examine what you truly seek from the process, and determine what your goals are. Collaborative Family Law may create an increased chance for desirable outcomes and, throughout the entire process, the greatest degree of client satisfaction.

   Fareen Jamal                                                 Jessie Lamont
   Bales Beall LLP                                              Bales Beal LLP
   2501-1 Adelaide Street East                       2501-1 Adelaide Street East
   Toronto, ON                                                   Toronto, ON
   M5C 2V9                                                        M5C 2V9

   Tel:  416-203-4538                                     Tel: 416-203-8591
   Fax:  416-203-8592                                    Fax: 416-203-8592
   fjamal@balesbeall.com                                jlamont@balesbeall.com

3. Family Law and the Participation Agreement

   September 19, 2011 9:13 am Leave a Comment

   The Participation Agreement

   The participation agreement is a fundamental element of every collaborative process.

   This agreement is signed by both parties and each of their lawyers at the first group meeting. It defines the relationship between all team members and sets out the rules of the game. Although the agreement may vary in different jurisdictions, it always includes the basic tenet of collaborative practice: that neither party will take this matter to court. And if they do, both parties will be required to retain new lawyers.

   Most participation agreements begin by stating the goal of the collaborative process, which is to settle any issues in a  non-adversarial manner in order to minimize, if not eliminate,the negative economic, social and emotional consequences for the parties and their family that would result from litigation or negotiations within an adversarial system. There is often a stated goal that the children of the marriage will not be negatively affected by the ongoing negotiations, and that resolutions will always consider what is in the best interest of the children.

   Participation agreements often include communication guidelines; these clarify and reinforce each participant’s duty to be respectful to all other team members, in both oral and written communications. The agreement sets out the expectation that everyone will be honest and forthright, that any mistakes will be noted and corrected, and that no  one will attempt to take advantage of inconsistencies.

   The collaborative process implies a responsibility and commitment to open and honest cooperation. The participation agreement is intended to educate and reinforce, as well as commit the parties to the collaborative process.

   Joelle Adelson, B.Comm., BCL, LL.B.

   Estate Planning, Collaborative Family Law, Mediation

   4-245 Wyecroft Road

   Oakville, ON L6K 3Y6